Difference between revisions of "Talk:Coriantumr/Understanding Coriantumr"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(why sub-pages?) |
m (MultiplyByZer0 moved page Talk:Melee Strategy/Understanding Coriantumr to Talk:Coriantumr/Understanding Coriantumr: Move article to subpage of the bot) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Hmm... I don't see any reasons why this page and Understanding HawkOnFire need to be sub-pages of Melee Strategy. I think it should be on its own page like [[Understanding Coriantumr]] and put it in Tutorial category. Any thoughts? » <span style="font-size:0.9em;color:darkgreen;">[[User:Nat|Nat]] | [[User_talk:Nat|Talk]]</span> » 13:15, 26 August 2009 (UTC) | Hmm... I don't see any reasons why this page and Understanding HawkOnFire need to be sub-pages of Melee Strategy. I think it should be on its own page like [[Understanding Coriantumr]] and put it in Tutorial category. Any thoughts? » <span style="font-size:0.9em;color:darkgreen;">[[User:Nat|Nat]] | [[User_talk:Nat|Talk]]</span> » 13:15, 26 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | : I agree that it shouldn't be a sup-page. [[Understanding Coriantumr]] seems a fine name to me, and it would still have a similarity in the article names ("Understanding <Bot>"). It should definitely be under [[:Category:Tutorials|Tutorials]], but I think the [[:Category:Strategy|Strategy category]] category needs some re-thinking... Right now we have [[:Category:1-vs-1 Strategy]] as a subcategory and a page called [[Melee Strategy]], which is kind of odd. Off-topic, but I think [[:Category:Robocode Theory]] and [[:Category:Terminology]] could use some re-thinking, too. --[[User:Voidious|Voidious]] 18:31, 28 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | : Yeah, that's confused. I agree with you on strategy-related category. We should have Melee Strategy category with a page Melee Strategy in that category as a top page i.e. not under any characterized sections (I don't remember how, but I've see this on Wikipedia) About other two categories you mentioned, I think we should rename [[:Category:Robocode Theory]] to [[:Category:Theory], readers are supposed to know that they are Robocode's. But what is Theory and what is Terminology by the way? On the other hand, I don't think eight years is enough to have a 'theory' =) » <span style="font-size:0.9em;color:darkgreen;">[[User:Nat|Nat]] | [[User_talk:Nat|Talk]]</span> » 04:37, 29 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 21:04, 9 August 2017
|
Hmm... I don't see any reasons why this page and Understanding HawkOnFire need to be sub-pages of Melee Strategy. I think it should be on its own page like Understanding Coriantumr and put it in Tutorial category. Any thoughts? » Nat | Talk » 13:15, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
- I agree that it shouldn't be a sup-page. Understanding Coriantumr seems a fine name to me, and it would still have a similarity in the article names ("Understanding <Bot>"). It should definitely be under Tutorials, but I think the Strategy category category needs some re-thinking... Right now we have Category:1-vs-1 Strategy as a subcategory and a page called Melee Strategy, which is kind of odd. Off-topic, but I think Category:Robocode Theory and Category:Terminology could use some re-thinking, too. --Voidious 18:31, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah, that's confused. I agree with you on strategy-related category. We should have Melee Strategy category with a page Melee Strategy in that category as a top page i.e. not under any characterized sections (I don't remember how, but I've see this on Wikipedia) About other two categories you mentioned, I think we should rename Category:Robocode Theory to [[:Category:Theory], readers are supposed to know that they are Robocode's. But what is Theory and what is Terminology by the way? On the other hand, I don't think eight years is enough to have a 'theory' =) » Nat | Talk » 04:37, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
