Difference between revisions of "Talk:SittingDuck"
Sparkey989 (talk | contribs) |
(simultaneous non-actions) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
-Sparkey989 | -Sparkey989 | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | '''''DID YOU KNOW''''': SittingDuck is an AdvancedRobot?! For something that sits around doing jack squat, he sure is complicated! --[[User:AWOL|AWOL]] 16:01, 11 November 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | : Well... He does have to not move and not shoot ''at the same time''. ;) --[[User:Voidious|Voidious]] 16:19, 11 November 2010 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 17:19, 11 November 2010
|
I take it all back! SittingDuck is the best robot on my computer! I just put all the bots on my computer in a battle on a 5000x5000 battlefield, and SittingDuck won! (well, he was the last bot standing in the first round, after which i clicked stop) -- Tango
Garb... I've just watched hours upon hours of Fractal vs. SittingDuck, and I still can't get its darn movement to work properly. In fact it loses quite consistently since it seems so good at crashing into walls. I'm so sick of angles... Ah well, as I have it now without the improvements I'm trying to make, it moves fairly well, and can already beat a lot of bots that shoot. For example, it can usually double Wisp's score. Not that Wisp is good or anything. Wait a minute... Since SittingDuck beats Fractal, and Fractal beats Wisp... SittingDuck must beat Wisp! And since Wisp is a MiniBot, SittingDuck must beat all MiniBots! Conclusion: SittingDuck is an excellent robot. :D -- Vuen
I sense flawed logic. -- Chase-san
MAN HE IS SO HARD TO BEAT!!!!!
-Sparkey989
DID YOU KNOW: SittingDuck is an AdvancedRobot?! For something that sits around doing jack squat, he sure is complicated! --AWOL 16:01, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
- Well... He does have to not move and not shoot at the same time. ;) --Voidious 16:19, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
