Difference between revisions of "Talk:PwnBot"

From Robowiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Blanked the page)
(no, it isn't embarrassing.)
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
  
 +
I have 68 bytes to spare on PwnBot for the targeting.  I'm sure I have more; I haven't tried to make the code smaller whatsoever, but I just want to know.  Would it just be a SPM?  [[User:Awesomeness|Awesomeness]] 02:44, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
 +
 +
: Symbolic Pattern Matcher?  Not for 68 bytes.  Most versions I've seen use 120ish bytes for that type of gun. --[[User:Miked0801|Miked0801]] 16:05, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
 +
 +
:: Well, I have not tried to compress the code much.  I suck at it, but I'm slowly getting better.  I'm sure if I post it at the [[Help:Help/Code Shrinking|Code Shrinking Help Request]] page, the size would get chopped in half.  But it's kind of embarrassing to post my bots there because I usually overlook really obvious ways to make it smaller...  [[User:Awesomeness|Awesomeness]] 17:33, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
 +
 +
:: No, it is not. Figure it out by your own take times, but if you post it you will figure out in no time. We normally post the what-is-behind-the-shrink too so you can learn from it. But maybe your code is already squeezed. Don't be embarrassed for learn.  --[[User:Nat|<span style="color:#099;">Nat</span>]] [[User talk:Nat|<span style="color:#0a5;">Pavasant</span>]] 10:57, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 11:57, 21 January 2010

I have 68 bytes to spare on PwnBot for the targeting. I'm sure I have more; I haven't tried to make the code smaller whatsoever, but I just want to know. Would it just be a SPM? Awesomeness 02:44, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

Symbolic Pattern Matcher? Not for 68 bytes. Most versions I've seen use 120ish bytes for that type of gun. --Miked0801 16:05, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
Well, I have not tried to compress the code much. I suck at it, but I'm slowly getting better. I'm sure if I post it at the Code Shrinking Help Request page, the size would get chopped in half. But it's kind of embarrassing to post my bots there because I usually overlook really obvious ways to make it smaller... Awesomeness 17:33, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
No, it is not. Figure it out by your own take times, but if you post it you will figure out in no time. We normally post the what-is-behind-the-shrink too so you can learn from it. But maybe your code is already squeezed. Don't be embarrassed for learn. --Nat Pavasant 10:57, 21 January 2010 (UTC)