Difference between revisions of "Talk:RWPCL"
(question) |
(right, RWPCL is "Copyleft") |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Is it, by this license, I'm not able to derive code from any robots under this license and use it in my robot where all my other code are either close-sourced or under the different license (such as [[NPRL]])? I know that you guys are not lawyers, but please answer. » <span style="font-size:0.9em;color:darkgreen;">[[User:Nat|Nat]] | [[User_talk:Nat|Talk]]</span> » 14:37, 20 August 2009 (UTC) | Is it, by this license, I'm not able to derive code from any robots under this license and use it in my robot where all my other code are either close-sourced or under the different license (such as [[NPRL]])? I know that you guys are not lawyers, but please answer. » <span style="font-size:0.9em;color:darkgreen;">[[User:Nat|Nat]] | [[User_talk:Nat|Talk]]</span> » 14:37, 20 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Right. If you use code from a RWPCL bot, your new robot's full source code must be open source under the RWPCL. This would apply to not just source code, but also to ideas or concepts that you learn from studying a RWPCL bot's code. The latter is a little bit fuzzier, as it's harder to prove, and many of those ideas/concepts can be found in non-RWPCL places, as well. This is generally called a [[wikipedia:Copyleft|Copyleft]] type of license, like the [[wikipedia:GNU General Public License|GPL]]. --[[User:Voidious|Voidious]] 14:46, 20 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 16:46, 20 August 2009
Is it, by this license, I'm not able to derive code from any robots under this license and use it in my robot where all my other code are either close-sourced or under the different license (such as NPRL)? I know that you guys are not lawyers, but please answer. » Nat | Talk » 14:37, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
Right. If you use code from a RWPCL bot, your new robot's full source code must be open source under the RWPCL. This would apply to not just source code, but also to ideas or concepts that you learn from studying a RWPCL bot's code. The latter is a little bit fuzzier, as it's harder to prove, and many of those ideas/concepts can be found in non-RWPCL places, as well. This is generally called a Copyleft type of license, like the GPL. --Voidious 14:46, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
