Difference between revisions of "Talk:Starrynte/Melee Evaluator Source"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(nice, why the default constructor throwing an exception?) |
m (reformat code) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<pre> | <pre> | ||
public MeleeEvaluate(){ | public MeleeEvaluate(){ | ||
| − | + | throw new RuntimeException("YOU MUST SPECIFY EXACTLY ONE (1) ADVANCED ROBOT AS A PARAMETER!"); | |
| − | + | } | |
</pre> | </pre> | ||
You could simply remove the default constructor, since you have a constructor with parameters Java won't create a default constructor for the class. So a call like <code>new MelleEvaluate()</code> would give compilation error instead of having to wait for a runtime error to find out. --[[User:Zyx|zyx]] 06:35, 14 September 2009 (UTC) | You could simply remove the default constructor, since you have a constructor with parameters Java won't create a default constructor for the class. So a call like <code>new MelleEvaluate()</code> would give compilation error instead of having to wait for a runtime error to find out. --[[User:Zyx|zyx]] 06:35, 14 September 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 07:36, 14 September 2009
Nice work, I haven't used it because I've been kind of busy lately, but I will try it when I start working on melee again. I was thinking about writing some melee evaluation myself anyway, I already do with 1v1. One question though, why do you have
public MeleeEvaluate(){
throw new RuntimeException("YOU MUST SPECIFY EXACTLY ONE (1) ADVANCED ROBOT AS A PARAMETER!");
}
You could simply remove the default constructor, since you have a constructor with parameters Java won't create a default constructor for the class. So a call like new MelleEvaluate() would give compilation error instead of having to wait for a runtime error to find out. --zyx 06:35, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
