Difference between revisions of "Talk:Displacement Targeting"
(→Displacement Vectors: no objection) |
m (→Displacement Vectors: too many [) |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Anyone object to me writing up the page for [[Displacement Vector]] based on how I use it in [[Diamond]]? I got the idea for using displacement vectors from this page, but Franzor is describing an algorithm, while my concept of displacement vectors is simply a way of recording/reconstructing firing angles. (My gun type should really be DC/DV, not DC/DT.) --[[User:Voidious|Voidious]] 15:52, 23 September 2009 (UTC) | Anyone object to me writing up the page for [[Displacement Vector]] based on how I use it in [[Diamond]]? I got the idea for using displacement vectors from this page, but Franzor is describing an algorithm, while my concept of displacement vectors is simply a way of recording/reconstructing firing angles. (My gun type should really be DC/DV, not DC/DT.) --[[User:Voidious|Voidious]] 15:52, 23 September 2009 (UTC) | ||
− | No objection =) (Perhaps this should have [[Displacement Targeting (traditional)]] and | + | No objection =) (Perhaps this should have [[Displacement Targeting (traditional)]] and [[Displacement Targeting (literal)]]) » [[User:Nat|<span style="color:#099;">Nat</span>]] [[User talk:Nat|<span style="color:#0a5;">Pavasant</span>]] » 15:55, 23 September 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:57, 23 September 2009
Categorizing this page
Should this page also be under "Targeting" and "Discussions" categories? I'm still not exactly sure what's the best way to do subcategories. For instance, I like the Bots category having all bots in it in addition to all its subcategories that contain the bots, but I'm not sure that every page should be part of all the parents of all its categories. --Voidious 06:23, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
Displacement Vectors
Anyone object to me writing up the page for Displacement Vector based on how I use it in Diamond? I got the idea for using displacement vectors from this page, but Franzor is describing an algorithm, while my concept of displacement vectors is simply a way of recording/reconstructing firing angles. (My gun type should really be DC/DV, not DC/DT.) --Voidious 15:52, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
No objection =) (Perhaps this should have Displacement Targeting (traditional) and Displacement Targeting (literal)) » Nat Pavasant » 15:55, 23 September 2009 (UTC)