Difference between revisions of "Talk:SittingDuck"
RobertWalker (talk | contribs) (Migrated) |
(Robobot 0.1 : correcting user page links) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| oldpage=SittingDuck | | oldpage=SittingDuck | ||
}} | }} | ||
| − | I take it all back! SittingDuck is the best robot on my computer! I just put all the bots on my computer in a battle on a 5000x5000 battlefield, and SittingDuck won! (well, he was the last bot standing in the first round, after which i clicked stop) -- [[Tango]] | + | I take it all back! SittingDuck is the best robot on my computer! I just put all the bots on my computer in a battle on a 5000x5000 battlefield, and SittingDuck won! (well, he was the last bot standing in the first round, after which i clicked stop) -- [[User:Tango|Tango]] |
---- | ---- | ||
| − | Garb... I've just watched hours upon hours of [[Fractal]] vs. SittingDuck, and I still can't get its darn movement to work properly. In fact it loses quite consistently since it seems so good at crashing into walls. I'm so sick of angles... Ah well, as I have it now without the improvements I'm trying to make, it moves fairly well, and can already beat a lot of bots that shoot. For example, it can usually double [[Wisp]]'s score. Not that [[Wisp]] is good or anything. Wait a minute... Since SittingDuck beats [[Fractal]], and [[Fractal]] beats [[Wisp]]... SittingDuck must beat [[Wisp]]! And since [[Wisp]] is a MiniBot, SittingDuck must beat all [[MiniBot]]s! Conclusion: SittingDuck is an excellent robot. :D -- [[Vuen]] | + | Garb... I've just watched hours upon hours of [[Fractal]] vs. SittingDuck, and I still can't get its darn movement to work properly. In fact it loses quite consistently since it seems so good at crashing into walls. I'm so sick of angles... Ah well, as I have it now without the improvements I'm trying to make, it moves fairly well, and can already beat a lot of bots that shoot. For example, it can usually double [[Wisp]]'s score. Not that [[Wisp]] is good or anything. Wait a minute... Since SittingDuck beats [[Fractal]], and [[Fractal]] beats [[Wisp]]... SittingDuck must beat [[Wisp]]! And since [[Wisp]] is a MiniBot, SittingDuck must beat all [[MiniBot]]s! Conclusion: SittingDuck is an excellent robot. :D -- [[User:Vuen|Vuen]] |
| − | I sense flawed logic. -- [[Chase-san]] | + | I sense flawed logic. -- [[User:Chase-san|Chase-san]] |
Revision as of 08:46, 22 May 2009
|
I take it all back! SittingDuck is the best robot on my computer! I just put all the bots on my computer in a battle on a 5000x5000 battlefield, and SittingDuck won! (well, he was the last bot standing in the first round, after which i clicked stop) -- Tango
Garb... I've just watched hours upon hours of Fractal vs. SittingDuck, and I still can't get its darn movement to work properly. In fact it loses quite consistently since it seems so good at crashing into walls. I'm so sick of angles... Ah well, as I have it now without the improvements I'm trying to make, it moves fairly well, and can already beat a lot of bots that shoot. For example, it can usually double Wisp's score. Not that Wisp is good or anything. Wait a minute... Since SittingDuck beats Fractal, and Fractal beats Wisp... SittingDuck must beat Wisp! And since Wisp is a MiniBot, SittingDuck must beat all MiniBots! Conclusion: SittingDuck is an excellent robot. :D -- Vuen
I sense flawed logic. -- Chase-san
