Difference between revisions of "Talk:Targeting Matrix"
(Created page with "Has anybody ever tried using a matrix to fire before? It seems like an extremely natural fit. --~~~~") |
(reply) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Has anybody ever tried using a matrix to fire before? It seems like an extremely natural fit. --[[User:Ceasar|Ceasar]] 22:24, 25 March 2011 (UTC) | Has anybody ever tried using a matrix to fire before? It seems like an extremely natural fit. --[[User:Ceasar|Ceasar]] 22:24, 25 March 2011 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | One a while back I had tried this. The term "targeting matrix" bothers me since there are plenty of ''other'' ways to use matrices in targeting such as as a part of clustering, for principal component analysis, or many other potential uses. I preferred the more descriptive terms "multivariate linear regression targeting" and "multivariate polynomial regression targeting". Anyway, when I tried this out, I found that it was okay-ish, but it really was a poor fit for two reasons: 1) It tended to give unrealistic values for less common situations, 2) It aims for the mean angle, when you really want to aim at the mode. --[[User:Rednaxela|Rednaxela]] 23:07, 25 March 2011 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 00:07, 26 March 2011
Has anybody ever tried using a matrix to fire before? It seems like an extremely natural fit. --Ceasar 22:24, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
One a while back I had tried this. The term "targeting matrix" bothers me since there are plenty of other ways to use matrices in targeting such as as a part of clustering, for principal component analysis, or many other potential uses. I preferred the more descriptive terms "multivariate linear regression targeting" and "multivariate polynomial regression targeting". Anyway, when I tried this out, I found that it was okay-ish, but it really was a poor fit for two reasons: 1) It tended to give unrealistic values for less common situations, 2) It aims for the mean angle, when you really want to aim at the mode. --Rednaxela 23:07, 25 March 2011 (UTC)