Difference between revisions of "Talk:Fuzzy Logic Targeting"
(what to do with articles like this one) |
(some thought) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I wonder if pages like this (and [[Displacement Targeting]] and [[ABCs Linked List Challenge]] and much of [[:Category:Targeting Discussions]] and [[:Category:Discussions]]) should be handled differently. They are discussions, so being in the main namespace like a normal article is odd. But the Talk namespace wouldn't be right either. Maybe a new namespace like "Ideas" or "Discussions"? Or just delete / re-organize them under our existing namespaces? Many of these pages were migrated from the old wiki, and probably wouldn't have been created in the first place on the new wiki... --[[User:Voidious|Voidious]] 17:01, 3 September 2011 (UTC) | I wonder if pages like this (and [[Displacement Targeting]] and [[ABCs Linked List Challenge]] and much of [[:Category:Targeting Discussions]] and [[:Category:Discussions]]) should be handled differently. They are discussions, so being in the main namespace like a normal article is odd. But the Talk namespace wouldn't be right either. Maybe a new namespace like "Ideas" or "Discussions"? Or just delete / re-organize them under our existing namespaces? Many of these pages were migrated from the old wiki, and probably wouldn't have been created in the first place on the new wiki... --[[User:Voidious|Voidious]] 17:01, 3 September 2011 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I think that why we has discussion category in the first place. Personally, I think it would be best if we rewrite them into article, and move the discussion to the talk page. But that is quite time-consuming. But I think we should at least put some notice on the page to tell people that these discussions are migrated from old wiki and are kept for historical reasons. --[[User:Nat|<span style="color:#099;">Nat</span>]] [[User talk:Nat|<span style="color:#0a5;">Pavasant</span>]] 01:17, 4 September 2011 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 02:17, 4 September 2011
I wonder if pages like this (and Displacement Targeting and ABCs Linked List Challenge and much of Category:Targeting Discussions and Category:Discussions) should be handled differently. They are discussions, so being in the main namespace like a normal article is odd. But the Talk namespace wouldn't be right either. Maybe a new namespace like "Ideas" or "Discussions"? Or just delete / re-organize them under our existing namespaces? Many of these pages were migrated from the old wiki, and probably wouldn't have been created in the first place on the new wiki... --Voidious 17:01, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
I think that why we has discussion category in the first place. Personally, I think it would be best if we rewrite them into article, and move the discussion to the talk page. But that is quite time-consuming. But I think we should at least put some notice on the page to tell people that these discussions are migrated from old wiki and are kept for historical reasons. --Nat Pavasant 01:17, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
