Difference between revisions of "Talk:Darkcanuck/RRServer"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Darkcanuck (talk | contribs) m (migrated from old wiki) |
Darkcanuck (talk | contribs) m (added new comment from old wiki) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
* Thanks! That's a good check, will be combining that with the survival >=35 (also your suggestion I think) once I rearrange the error handling and failure output to the client. Then I'll look into ELO... --[[Darkcanuck]] | * Thanks! That's a good check, will be combining that with the survival >=35 (also your suggestion I think) once I rearrange the error handling and failure output to the client. Then I'll look into ELO... --[[Darkcanuck]] | ||
| + | * Your checks have both been implemented. -- [[Darkcanuck]] | ||
Revision as of 22:55, 25 September 2008
Fire away...
Just a suggestion for an additional check. I have never seen score a bot more than 8000 points, so this could be checked too. When examining the results that messed up the original roborumble rating beyond repair, I saw results of 20000 against 16000 (Thats what you get when running OneOnOne with MELEE=YES). For the time being I let my client running (unattended) for ABC's server, as I don't really have the time for bughunting. Your effort however seems promising. Good luck. -- GrubbmGait
- Thanks! That's a good check, will be combining that with the survival >=35 (also your suggestion I think) once I rearrange the error handling and failure output to the client. Then I'll look into ELO... --Darkcanuck
- Your checks have both been implemented. -- Darkcanuck
