Difference between revisions of "Talk:BestPSpace"

From Robowiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(moving BestPSpace chat)
 
(Robobot 0.1 : correcting user page links)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
== From old wiki's BestPSpace page ==
 
== From old wiki's BestPSpace page ==
  
My prediction: This is the firing that the future killer bot will use. --[[tobe]]
+
My prediction: This is the firing that the future killer bot will use. --[[User:Tobe|tobe]]
  
Seems like it might have problems with learning speed, especially if the eternal rumble continues to use 10 round battles. --[[David Alves]]
+
Seems like it might have problems with learning speed, especially if the eternal rumble continues to use 10 round battles. --[[User:David Alves|David Alves]]
  
 
So was this basically segmentation of GF targeting, or is there more to it? -- [[Jokester]]
 
So was this basically segmentation of GF targeting, or is there more to it? -- [[Jokester]]

Latest revision as of 09:39, 22 May 2009

From old wiki's BestPSpace page

My prediction: This is the firing that the future killer bot will use. --tobe

Seems like it might have problems with learning speed, especially if the eternal rumble continues to use 10 round battles. --David Alves

So was this basically segmentation of GF targeting, or is there more to it? -- Jokester

When I read it I understood it as GF segmentation, but with segments treated separately. Maybe I was wrong ;) --lRem

Seems like a good system. The real trick to making it learn faster is to choose families that show some real relationships. You could have many different options for families built into the code, but only store and collect the ones that show a significant correlation (thankfully, there are established ways to evaluate this). I would be willing to bet that the biggest source of problems with this method is the fact that 90% of top bots use some form of wave surfing, so only the GuessFactorTargeting family will show any correlation. --speal