Difference between revisions of "Talk:Hebe"

From Robowiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(52% pbi is not so high)
Line 5: Line 5:
 
I know that, but what about PBI of (-40.7,50.8) I ''never'' saw this rate of PBI before! It super high. I think  I'll keep this robot here, with this crazy PBI. &raquo; <span style="font-size:0.9em;color:darkgreen;">[[User:Nat|Nat]] | [[User_talk:Nat|Talk]]</span> &raquo; 00:19, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 
I know that, but what about PBI of (-40.7,50.8) I ''never'' saw this rate of PBI before! It super high. I think  I'll keep this robot here, with this crazy PBI. &raquo; <span style="font-size:0.9em;color:darkgreen;">[[User:Nat|Nat]] | [[User_talk:Nat|Talk]]</span> &raquo; 00:19, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
  
OH! It's now -52.4/45.0!!!!!!!!!!!!! Can anyone explain?????????????????????
+
OH! It's now -52.4/45.0!!!!!!!!!!!!!<br />Can anyone explain?????????????????????
  
 
Right now I'm quite sure that this Segmented Mean Circular gun is better against Surfer, that I got more score from WeeksOnEnd than WeeklongObsession. The advanced your wave surfing are, the better hit rate I'll get. (except Phoenix, which 7%) I got 25 against Shadow while I got 10% against WeekendObsession! (Note: I got 25% from WeeksOnEnd, 7% from WeeklongObsession, 13% against Dookious) Another exception is Tron, 30% against 2.02 while 19% against 3.11.
 
Right now I'm quite sure that this Segmented Mean Circular gun is better against Surfer, that I got more score from WeeksOnEnd than WeeklongObsession. The advanced your wave surfing are, the better hit rate I'll get. (except Phoenix, which 7%) I got 25 against Shadow while I got 10% against WeekendObsession! (Note: I got 25% from WeeksOnEnd, 7% from WeeklongObsession, 13% against Dookious) Another exception is Tron, 30% against 2.02 while 19% against 3.11.
Line 12: Line 12:
  
 
Even 52% PBI is not so high! Just look at Mosquito 1.1 on Microrumble : it has -68% against Invader! --[[User:Robar|HUNRobar]] 14:43, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
 
Even 52% PBI is not so high! Just look at Mosquito 1.1 on Microrumble : it has -68% against Invader! --[[User:Robar|HUNRobar]] 14:43, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
 +
 +
Yeah, but I'm talking about positive PBI, not negative =) It seem that you have 34.7/-68.5, 35.2/-70.5 while I have 52.3/-40.2, 44.4/-52.0 (microrumble/roborumble) Either way, you still win! &raquo; <span style="font-size:0.9em;color:darkgreen;">[[User:Nat|Nat]] | [[User_talk:Nat|Talk]]</span> &raquo; 15:10, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:10, 27 May 2009

Hi, are there any error with this robot? I'm weak against weak, but strong against strong. Look at this page [1], sort by PBI, and you will see a PBI of (-36.3,48.6) Also, interesting LRP, directly goes down. Is there any errors? I not expected much on this robot but it has interesting PBI. » Nat | Talk » 13:26, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

You get stuck against the wall quite often. That is the sole reason. --GrubbmGait 19:42, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

I know that, but what about PBI of (-40.7,50.8) I never saw this rate of PBI before! It super high. I think I'll keep this robot here, with this crazy PBI. » Nat | Talk » 00:19, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

OH! It's now -52.4/45.0!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Can anyone explain?????????????????????

Right now I'm quite sure that this Segmented Mean Circular gun is better against Surfer, that I got more score from WeeksOnEnd than WeeklongObsession. The advanced your wave surfing are, the better hit rate I'll get. (except Phoenix, which 7%) I got 25 against Shadow while I got 10% against WeekendObsession! (Note: I got 25% from WeeksOnEnd, 7% from WeeklongObsession, 13% against Dookious) Another exception is Tron, 30% against 2.02 while 19% against 3.11.

» Nat | Talk » 07:32, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Even 52% PBI is not so high! Just look at Mosquito 1.1 on Microrumble : it has -68% against Invader! --HUNRobar 14:43, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, but I'm talking about positive PBI, not negative =) It seem that you have 34.7/-68.5, 35.2/-70.5 while I have 52.3/-40.2, 44.4/-52.0 (microrumble/roborumble) Either way, you still win! » Nat | Talk » 15:10, 27 May 2009 (UTC)