Difference between revisions of "Talk:TybaltMelee"

From Robowiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(So close)
Line 9: Line 9:
  
 
Great bot, well done! I'm absolutely noob at melee, but I plan to make a 1v1/melee nano, but the best would be a 1v1/melee/team version. ;) --[[User:Robar|HUNRobar]] 14:55, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
 
Great bot, well done! I'm absolutely noob at melee, but I plan to make a 1v1/melee nano, but the best would be a 1v1/melee/team version. ;) --[[User:Robar|HUNRobar]] 14:55, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
 +
 +
Ouch.... Right now Tybalt is about 0.01 points away from a higher spot, and the next highest robot is just 0.05 points from that. I guess a few points can go a long way here--[[User:CrazyBassoonist|CrazyBassoonist]] 19:23, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
  
 
== Why remove? ==
 
== Why remove? ==

Revision as of 20:23, 27 May 2009

Now you've gone and done it. Whne this bot gets competative, I'll have to go revisit DustBunny again :) --Miked0801 05:49, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

Thanks! This is my first top ten bot, and I think I still have some upgrades for it. Just looking at the scores, I've been wondering how they're calculated. Do you get a score just whenever two nano bots are in a match together, or does it have to be a match of only nano's? Because if Tybalt will be fighting all the melee bots, I'll need to update my testbed.....--CrazyBassoonist 12:34, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

In melee, you get a score whenever there are two nanos in the same match. A full nano battle is likely a very rare occurrence. --Darkcanuck 13:01, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
Hmm.... I've only tested against other nano's so far, maybe this will help me improve it.... Thanks--CrazyBassoonist 13:05, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

Also, I would like to tell you that your robot Infinity has the most annoying movement ever created. I can't count the times while testing that I saw Tybalt with 60-70 energy beaten by Infinity with 10-20 energy just because he couldn't hit the thing--CrazyBassoonist 12:38, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

Great bot, well done! I'm absolutely noob at melee, but I plan to make a 1v1/melee nano, but the best would be a 1v1/melee/team version. ;) --HUNRobar 14:55, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

Ouch.... Right now Tybalt is about 0.01 points away from a higher spot, and the next highest robot is just 0.05 points from that. I guess a few points can go a long way here--CrazyBassoonist 19:23, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

Why remove?

"Removed TybaltMelee; Couldn't handle the awful scores" -- CrazyBassonist from an edit summary.

What's is your awful score? I can't call 6th place awful... And if you are wondering about mega melee robot (abc.*, rz.*, justin.*, kc.* and voidious.*) Note that other nanobots are battle them too. » Nat | Talk » 13:25, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

No, I am quite pleased with 6th place=). I removed it from the one-on-one rumble as it was somewhere down in the 500's or 600's--CrazyBassoonist 13:29, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

Oops. Sorry for misunderstanding. Actually that isn't call awful by my standard. I recently working on some new nanobot movement and I expected to be around middle of the NanoBot chart. Well, it is at the #2 place, only from the last =) » Nat | Talk » 13:49, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

6th so far with a few mro bots to go against. Nice. I've switched my local computer over to melee battles for a bit to help average out your stats. --Miked0801 14:46, 27 May 2009 (UTC)