Difference between revisions of "Talk:Gaff/Targeting"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Darkcanuck (talk | contribs) (yes, the AS net is even better alone) |
(A hunch) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
: It was long overdue. Yes, the AS network scored 82.93 on the surfer portion of the [[TC2K7]] (15 seasons) but only got 80.45 against the others. I continue to tweak it every once in a while but have yet to break the 83 barrier... --[[User:Darkcanuck|Darkcanuck]] 20:09, 16 July 2009 (UTC) | : It was long overdue. Yes, the AS network scored 82.93 on the surfer portion of the [[TC2K7]] (15 seasons) but only got 80.45 against the others. I continue to tweak it every once in a while but have yet to break the 83 barrier... --[[User:Darkcanuck|Darkcanuck]] 20:09, 16 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Ooh.. very interesting things here... The sentance that most intrigues me right now is ''"Waves that already give the correct solution are not retrained."''. I have a hunch that this could be rather important in how well Gaff hits surfers, and may be useful outside of the world of NN guns too --[[User:Rednaxela|Rednaxela]] 00:05, 17 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 02:05, 17 July 2009
This is really cool, thanks for writing it up. Makes me want to tinker. =) I'm curious, does the "anti-surfer" network alone do even better against surfers? --Voidious 19:24, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
- It was long overdue. Yes, the AS network scored 82.93 on the surfer portion of the TC2K7 (15 seasons) but only got 80.45 against the others. I continue to tweak it every once in a while but have yet to break the 83 barrier... --Darkcanuck 20:09, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
Ooh.. very interesting things here... The sentance that most intrigues me right now is "Waves that already give the correct solution are not retrained.". I have a hunch that this could be rather important in how well Gaff hits surfers, and may be useful outside of the world of NN guns too --Rednaxela 00:05, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
