Difference between revisions of "Talk:Shadow"

From Robowiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(no problem)
(→‎v3.84: seems easy to take the throne)
Line 15: Line 15:
  
 
Yes I did. It took me a while to tweak it to preform as good as the "old" movement in my tests, but great fun nevertheless. :) --[[User:ABC|ABC]] 23:37, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
 
Yes I did. It took me a while to tweak it to preform as good as the "old" movement in my tests, but great fun nevertheless. :) --[[User:ABC|ABC]] 23:37, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
 +
 +
Congrats man, you really make it look easy to take the melee throne back, almost a full 1% of APS above the 2nd with much sporadic updates compared to [[Diamond]]'s high activity. --[[User:Zyx|zyx]] 19:39, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:39, 3 September 2009

ABC, do you mind if I change the information on the bot's page to more updated one? Such as 'Wave Surfing' for one-one-one movement. » Nat | Talk » 08:19, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

Be my guest, this text hasn't been updated since forever. --ABC 10:06, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

So can I update it or not? » Nat | Talk » 11:06, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

Yes, you can. --ABC 11:34, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

Thanks, it looks great! I It would take me forever to learn all this mediawiki stuff. And the "A long time ago..." release date is really funny, and true. :) --ABC 13:08, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

No Problem =) I don't think you can remember your release date, not sure if you still have abc.Shadow_1.0.jar in your hard drive =) » Nat | Talk » 14:00, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

v3.84

I just downloaded your new version, and the movement seems quite different from 3.83. I'm curious: did you add the bullet detector you said you were thinking about? --Positive 23:26, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Yes I did. It took me a while to tweak it to preform as good as the "old" movement in my tests, but great fun nevertheless. :) --ABC 23:37, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Congrats man, you really make it look easy to take the melee throne back, almost a full 1% of APS above the 2nd with much sporadic updates compared to Diamond's high activity. --zyx 19:39, 3 September 2009 (UTC)