Difference between revisions of "Talk:WaveSerpent/Version History"
(wow) |
(Amazing stuff!) |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Wow, that must be the greatest robocode comeback of all times, congratulations! :) --[[User:ABC|ABC]] 14:22, 29 September 2009 (UTC) | Wow, that must be the greatest robocode comeback of all times, congratulations! :) --[[User:ABC|ABC]] 14:22, 29 September 2009 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | Those are some seriously impressive results there! I'm curious about how you note use of anti aliasing. Do you refer to anti aliasing between segments like I pioneered with [[User:Rednaxela/SaphireEdge|SaphireEdge]]? Or do you mean anti aliasing between bins? Or what? I find it odd how you say that since unless [[WaveSerpent]] switched from DC to VCS, I don't see how anti aliasing would be applicable. --[[User:Rednaxela|Rednaxela]] 14:52, 29 September 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:52, 29 September 2009
2.0
I hope it's not too early to say... holy cow, great work! At 400 battles and 0.7% APS above Dookious. Still plenty of battles to go, but you've surely got the #2 spot. Amazing! Congrats! --Voidious 02:06, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
It looks like I've got some competition as an early birthday present! That's a huge jump for a single release! Very impressed =) --Skilgannon 05:03, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
Wow, that must be the greatest robocode comeback of all times, congratulations! :) --ABC 14:22, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
Those are some seriously impressive results there! I'm curious about how you note use of anti aliasing. Do you refer to anti aliasing between segments like I pioneered with SaphireEdge? Or do you mean anti aliasing between bins? Or what? I find it odd how you say that since unless WaveSerpent switched from DC to VCS, I don't see how anti aliasing would be applicable. --Rednaxela 14:52, 29 September 2009 (UTC)