Difference between revisions of "Talk:PwnBot"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Awesomeness (talk | contribs) (Compressing the code to fit in SPM) |
Awesomeness (talk | contribs) m (Signature) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
: Symbolic Pattern Matcher? Not for 68 bytes. Most versions I've seen use 120ish bytes for that type of gun. --[[User:Miked0801|Miked0801]] 16:05, 20 January 2010 (UTC) | : Symbolic Pattern Matcher? Not for 68 bytes. Most versions I've seen use 120ish bytes for that type of gun. --[[User:Miked0801|Miked0801]] 16:05, 20 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
| − | :: Well, I have not tried to compress the code much. I suck at it, but I'm slowly getting better. I'm sure if I post it at the [[Help:Help/Code Shrinking|Code Shrinking Help Request]] page, the size would get chopped in half. But it's kind of embarrassing to post my bots there because I usually overlook really obvious ways to make it smaller... | + | :: Well, I have not tried to compress the code much. I suck at it, but I'm slowly getting better. I'm sure if I post it at the [[Help:Help/Code Shrinking|Code Shrinking Help Request]] page, the size would get chopped in half. But it's kind of embarrassing to post my bots there because I usually overlook really obvious ways to make it smaller... [[User:Awesomeness|Awesomeness]] 17:33, 20 January 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:33, 20 January 2010
I have 68 bytes to spare on PwnBot for the targeting. I'm sure I have more; I haven't tried to make the code smaller whatsoever, but I just want to know. Would it just be a SPM? Awesomeness 02:44, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
- Symbolic Pattern Matcher? Not for 68 bytes. Most versions I've seen use 120ish bytes for that type of gun. --Miked0801 16:05, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
- Well, I have not tried to compress the code much. I suck at it, but I'm slowly getting better. I'm sure if I post it at the Code Shrinking Help Request page, the size would get chopped in half. But it's kind of embarrassing to post my bots there because I usually overlook really obvious ways to make it smaller... Awesomeness 17:33, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
