Difference between revisions of "DeBroglie/Archived Talk 2010"
(→Shooting where a surfer would go: complications) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
This is not as simple as it first seems... Sure, you can keep track of surf stats from the enemy perspective, and when you fire, you can shoot at a less visited bin instead of a most visited one. But most of the time, there are already 1-3 bullets in the air. The enemy will first surf each of those before deciding how to surf the bullet you're firing, then he'll choose the safest from the bins that are still reachable, not from all of them. Add in the discrepancies in data analysis (what you segment on, how fast you roll your stats) and it's very hard. I don't think anyone's been able to find something that works. I've personally tried quite a few approaches with no success. Good luck though. =) It's actually something that I still think has potential. --[[User:Voidious|Voidious]] 13:06, 27 October 2010 (UTC) | This is not as simple as it first seems... Sure, you can keep track of surf stats from the enemy perspective, and when you fire, you can shoot at a less visited bin instead of a most visited one. But most of the time, there are already 1-3 bullets in the air. The enemy will first surf each of those before deciding how to surf the bullet you're firing, then he'll choose the safest from the bins that are still reachable, not from all of them. Add in the discrepancies in data analysis (what you segment on, how fast you roll your stats) and it's very hard. I don't think anyone's been able to find something that works. I've personally tried quite a few approaches with no success. Good luck though. =) It's actually something that I still think has potential. --[[User:Voidious|Voidious]] 13:06, 27 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | * That is something that occurred to me in the conceptual phase. My plan for movement was to recursively surf all waves in the air (or up to whatever depth I can handle, I have little experience with where Robocode shuts a bot off on data processing for a turn) meaning that by symmetry I could fire at an opponent surfing all of the waves I had in the air. In reality, this would work delightfully if I pitted two copied of deBroglie against each other, but the differences between my surfing algorithm and any other bot's would make the exercise fruitless in practice. -[[User:Tkiesel|Tkiesel]] 17:49, 27 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 18:49, 27 October 2010
Shooting where a surfer would go
This is not as simple as it first seems... Sure, you can keep track of surf stats from the enemy perspective, and when you fire, you can shoot at a less visited bin instead of a most visited one. But most of the time, there are already 1-3 bullets in the air. The enemy will first surf each of those before deciding how to surf the bullet you're firing, then he'll choose the safest from the bins that are still reachable, not from all of them. Add in the discrepancies in data analysis (what you segment on, how fast you roll your stats) and it's very hard. I don't think anyone's been able to find something that works. I've personally tried quite a few approaches with no success. Good luck though. =) It's actually something that I still think has potential. --Voidious 13:06, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
- That is something that occurred to me in the conceptual phase. My plan for movement was to recursively surf all waves in the air (or up to whatever depth I can handle, I have little experience with where Robocode shuts a bot off on data processing for a turn) meaning that by symmetry I could fire at an opponent surfing all of the waves I had in the air. In reality, this would work delightfully if I pitted two copied of deBroglie against each other, but the differences between my surfing algorithm and any other bot's would make the exercise fruitless in practice. -Tkiesel 17:49, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
