Difference between revisions of "User talk:Anouthen"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
GrubbmGait (talk | contribs) (welcome and zero score) |
(toDegrees, test server) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Hello Anouthen, welcome to the wiki. | Hello Anouthen, welcome to the wiki. | ||
Just for your information: your bots use a function 'normalRelativeAngleDegrees()' that is not known by the version of Robocode used for the rumble (1.6.1.4). Your bots therefor get a 'zero' score. It would be a pity if you loose interest just because of that. --[[User:GrubbmGait|GrubbmGait]] 01:07, 17 March 2011 (UTC) | Just for your information: your bots use a function 'normalRelativeAngleDegrees()' that is not known by the version of Robocode used for the rumble (1.6.1.4). Your bots therefor get a 'zero' score. It would be a pity if you loose interest just because of that. --[[User:GrubbmGait|GrubbmGait]] 01:07, 17 March 2011 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Btw, we are looking to move to the latest Robocode sometime, but we are still testing it and haven't moved yet. On that note, your bot should get results on the [http://rednaxela-robocode.dyndns.org/rumble/Rankings?game=roborumble test server], but fewer people run clients for that... Math.toDegrees(Utils.normalRelativeAngle(...)) should be an easy fix for you though. --[[User:Voidious|Voidious]] 01:18, 17 March 2011 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 02:18, 17 March 2011
Hello Anouthen, welcome to the wiki. Just for your information: your bots use a function 'normalRelativeAngleDegrees()' that is not known by the version of Robocode used for the rumble (1.6.1.4). Your bots therefor get a 'zero' score. It would be a pity if you loose interest just because of that. --GrubbmGait 01:07, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
Btw, we are looking to move to the latest Robocode sometime, but we are still testing it and haven't moved yet. On that note, your bot should get results on the test server, but fewer people run clients for that... Math.toDegrees(Utils.normalRelativeAngle(...)) should be an easy fix for you though. --Voidious 01:18, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
