Difference between revisions of "Thread:Talk:Toorkild/0.3.0/reply (4)"

From Robowiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Reply to 0.3.0)
 
(Minor edit.)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
−
I know what you mean.  I experimented for weeks trying to come up with something original for [[Foilist]], playing with all sorts of 'adapting [[Stop And Go]]' and other movements that would fit with the [[WeekendObsession]] gun.  I think that the current nanobot paradigm is nearing its end.  If you really want to do something revolutionary, I would suggest trying to code a bot in [[Jasmin]]. I look forward to [[Machete]] 2.0, good luck.
+
I know how you feel.  I worked for weeks trying to come up with something original for [[Foilist]], but almost all good movements had already been taken.  I think that the current nanobot paradigm is nearing its end.  If you really want to do something revolutionary, I would suggest trying to code a bot with [[Jasmin]].  
 +
 
 +
I look forward to your next game-changer, good luck.

Latest revision as of 02:43, 17 December 2012

I know how you feel. I worked for weeks trying to come up with something original for Foilist, but almost all good movements had already been taken. I think that the current nanobot paradigm is nearing its end. If you really want to do something revolutionary, I would suggest trying to code a bot with Jasmin.

I look forward to your next game-changer, good luck.

Retrieved from "http://robowiki.net/w/index.php?title=Thread:Talk:Toorkild/0.3.0/reply_(4)&oldid=27854"