Difference between revisions of "Thread:Talk:Épéeist/Code mods/reply (14)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Reply to Code mods) |
(edit) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | Can't remember if we were the first, but I know Chase and I used user1.user2.* for [[Scarlet]]. The thinking was a subtle distinction between specific team-ups and totally wide-open bots, but I'm kind of on the fence about "user1.user2.*" vs the wiki package. | + | Can't remember if we were the first, but I know Chase and I used user1.user2.* for [[Scarlet]]. The thinking was a subtle distinction between specific team-ups and totally wide-open bots, but I'm kind of on the fence about "user1.user2.*" vs the wiki package. It really was a test bot like DrussiousGT, though the thinking was to leave it up there till either Chase or I surpassed Scarlet individually (though Scarlet has been removed despite that point not yet being reached due to some performance issues it had). |
On the subject of the wiki package, now that you mention it, I'd say I would prefer "robowiki." over "wiki." for sure. | On the subject of the wiki package, now that you mention it, I'd say I would prefer "robowiki." over "wiki." for sure. | ||
Latest revision as of 21:06, 20 March 2013
Can't remember if we were the first, but I know Chase and I used user1.user2.* for Scarlet. The thinking was a subtle distinction between specific team-ups and totally wide-open bots, but I'm kind of on the fence about "user1.user2.*" vs the wiki package. It really was a test bot like DrussiousGT, though the thinking was to leave it up there till either Chase or I surpassed Scarlet individually (though Scarlet has been removed despite that point not yet being reached due to some performance issues it had).
On the subject of the wiki package, now that you mention it, I'd say I would prefer "robowiki." over "wiki." for sure.
