Difference between revisions of "Talk:RoboRumble/Reported Problems"
(repeated battles indeed) |
GrubbmGait (talk | contribs) (SilverSurfer problem with 1.6.0) |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
Woah, I certainly see the results of these stuck pairings... such as Drifter vs Okami over 200 times, and similar for Fermat vs Okami. It sure feels unusual seeing over 100 battles in any pairing in RR, but at least we know those pairings are accurate haha. --[[User:Rednaxela|Rednaxela]] 19:22, 22 September 2008 (UTC) | Woah, I certainly see the results of these stuck pairings... such as Drifter vs Okami over 200 times, and similar for Fermat vs Okami. It sure feels unusual seeing over 100 battles in any pairing in RR, but at least we know those pairings are accurate haha. --[[User:Rednaxela|Rednaxela]] 19:22, 22 September 2008 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | As for accuracy, below is the impact of battles on the score. This is 0.7*old + 0.3*new. For first battle you can also read 'all battles till now'. This means that 2 new battles will reduce the influence of the previous ones to 50%. | ||
+ | <pre> | ||
+ | 1 2 3 4 5 | ||
+ | first 100 | ||
+ | second 70 30 | ||
+ | third 49 21 30 | ||
+ | fourth 35 14 21 30 | ||
+ | fifth 25 10 14 21 30 | ||
+ | </pre> --[[User:GrubbmGait|GrubbmGait]] 23:52, 22 September 2008 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Security exception 1.6.0 == | ||
+ | |||
+ | One bot suffers from a security exception in v1.6.0, namely axebots.SilverSurfer. | ||
+ | It seems the only bot that has this problem, so the impact is not that big. Maybe someone (or Axe himself) can update the bot so it can be processed by the latest robocode versions. --[[User:GrubbmGait|GrubbmGait]] 23:52, 22 September 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:52, 23 September 2008
Repeated Battles
Not sure if this is the best place to put this, but here it is. My roborumble client would keep getting hung up running the same bot over & over, regardless of how many battles it already had or how many other bots were below the BATTLES_PER_BOT limit I set. I think I took care of the problem by deleting files between between runs of the rumble. This is my roborumble.bat file now:
:TOP java -Xmx256M -Dsun.io.useCanonCaches=false -cp libs/robocode.jar;libs/codesize.jar;libs/roborumble.jar roborumble.RoboRumbleAtHome ./roborumble/roborumble.txt del roborumble\temp\battles* del roborumble\temp\priority* GOTO TOP
I think the priority battles file was the culprit, but I'm leaving the other line in for good measure. --Simonton 16:35, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
Woah, I certainly see the results of these stuck pairings... such as Drifter vs Okami over 200 times, and similar for Fermat vs Okami. It sure feels unusual seeing over 100 battles in any pairing in RR, but at least we know those pairings are accurate haha. --Rednaxela 19:22, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
As for accuracy, below is the impact of battles on the score. This is 0.7*old + 0.3*new. For first battle you can also read 'all battles till now'. This means that 2 new battles will reduce the influence of the previous ones to 50%.
1 2 3 4 5 first 100 second 70 30 third 49 21 30 fourth 35 14 21 30 fifth 25 10 14 21 30
--GrubbmGait 23:52, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
Security exception 1.6.0
One bot suffers from a security exception in v1.6.0, namely axebots.SilverSurfer. It seems the only bot that has this problem, so the impact is not that big. Maybe someone (or Axe himself) can update the bot so it can be processed by the latest robocode versions. --GrubbmGait 23:52, 22 September 2008 (UTC)