Difference between revisions of "Talk:Darkcanuck/RRServer/KnownIssues"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Survival count should total 35) |
GrubbmGait (talk | contribs) (accepting non-35 wins results) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I want to confirm what has already been mentioned: survival count should not necessarily total 35. It appears that when bots die on the same tick, they both get credited with a first place finish. --[[User:Simonton|Simonton]] 22:49, 27 September 2008 (UTC) | I want to confirm what has already been mentioned: survival count should not necessarily total 35. It appears that when bots die on the same tick, they both get credited with a first place finish. --[[User:Simonton|Simonton]] 22:49, 27 September 2008 (UTC) | ||
| + | *There was only one unmatching battle (17+14) in the over 5000 results I sent to this server. But indeed, 34 and 36 should be accepted too in my opinion. I think that battles against rambots (used to) have the most chance on getting these non-35 results. --[[User:GrubbmGait|GrubbmGait]] 23:16, 27 September 2008 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 00:16, 28 September 2008
Survival count should total 35
I want to confirm what has already been mentioned: survival count should not necessarily total 35. It appears that when bots die on the same tick, they both get credited with a first place finish. --Simonton 22:49, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
- There was only one unmatching battle (17+14) in the over 5000 results I sent to this server. But indeed, 34 and 36 should be accepted too in my opinion. I think that battles against rambots (used to) have the most chance on getting these non-35 results. --GrubbmGait 23:16, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
