Difference between revisions of "Thread:User talk:Skilgannon/KDTree/Regarding PrioQueue/reply (8)"
m (Reply to Regarding PrioQueue) |
m (fix formatting) |
||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
<pre>java version "1.7.0_40" | <pre>java version "1.7.0_40" | ||
OpenJDK Runtime Environment (IcedTea 2.4.1) (ArchLinux build 7.u40_2.4.1-1-x86_64) | OpenJDK Runtime Environment (IcedTea 2.4.1) (ArchLinux build 7.u40_2.4.1-1-x86_64) | ||
− | OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 24.0-b50, mixed mode)<pre> | + | OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 24.0-b50, mixed mode)</pre> |
I have my root partition running on an SSD with the /home partition running on a spinning disk, but I doubt the disk situation affects this benchmark at all in any case. | I have my root partition running on an SSD with the /home partition running on a spinning disk, but I doubt the disk situation affects this benchmark at all in any case. |
Revision as of 13:54, 18 July 2013
Here's the CPU I'm using. That was with 8GB of DDR3 running at 1066MHz, but that's intentionally underclocked by a lot. If I clock my memory up to it's rated frequency of 1600MHz the result is as follows:
- #1 Rednaxela's kd-tree (3rd gen) [0.0276] - #2 Skilgannon's Cache-hit KDTree [0.0288] - #3 Rednaxela's kd-tree (2nd gen) [0.0340] - #4 Voidious' Linear search [0.5593]
A little faster all around, but not much difference with memory clock rate it seems.
The AMD Phenom II I'm using has 6MB of L3 cache, 512kB of L2 cache per-core, completely seperate.
The Intel Core i5 you're using has 3MB of L3 cache, 256kB of L2 cache per-core, though it looks like supposedly intel has some method of allowing the two cores to access eachother's L2 cache.
Java version:
java version "1.7.0_40" OpenJDK Runtime Environment (IcedTea 2.4.1) (ArchLinux build 7.u40_2.4.1-1-x86_64) OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 24.0-b50, mixed mode)
I have my root partition running on an SSD with the /home partition running on a spinning disk, but I doubt the disk situation affects this benchmark at all in any case.