Difference between revisions of "Thread:User talk:Skilgannon/KDTree/Regarding PrioQueue/reply (11)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Reply to Regarding PrioQueue) |
m (note version) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
# All of them perform much worse in OracleJava/Windows than it did on OpenJDK/Linux | # All of them perform much worse in OracleJava/Windows than it did on OpenJDK/Linux | ||
# The relative performance of things looks much more similar to what you saw, with only a small difference between my 3rd and 2nd gen tree, with your one performing better | # The relative performance of things looks much more similar to what you saw, with only a small difference between my 3rd and 2nd gen tree, with your one performing better | ||
| + | |||
| + | <pre>java version "1.7.0_25" | ||
| + | Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.7.0_25-b17) | ||
| + | Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 23.25-b01, mixed mode, sharing)</pre> | ||
Revision as of 02:45, 19 July 2013
So, it turns out that if I use Oracle Java in Windows instead of OpenJDK on Linux, the performance is very different:
- #1 Skilgannon's Cache-hit KDTree [0.0419] - #2 Rednaxela's kd-tree (3rd gen) [0.0451] - #3 Rednaxela's kd-tree (2nd gen) [0.0458] - #4 Voidious' Linear search [0.7056]
- All of them perform much worse in OracleJava/Windows than it did on OpenJDK/Linux
- The relative performance of things looks much more similar to what you saw, with only a small difference between my 3rd and 2nd gen tree, with your one performing better
java version "1.7.0_25" Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.7.0_25-b17) Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 23.25-b01, mixed mode, sharing)
