Difference between revisions of "Talk:Darkcanuck/RRServer/KnownIssues"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
GrubbmGait (talk | contribs) (accepting non-35 wins results) |
Darkcanuck (talk | contribs) (32 total and less) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
I want to confirm what has already been mentioned: survival count should not necessarily total 35. It appears that when bots die on the same tick, they both get credited with a first place finish. --[[User:Simonton|Simonton]] 22:49, 27 September 2008 (UTC) | I want to confirm what has already been mentioned: survival count should not necessarily total 35. It appears that when bots die on the same tick, they both get credited with a first place finish. --[[User:Simonton|Simonton]] 22:49, 27 September 2008 (UTC) | ||
*There was only one unmatching battle (17+14) in the over 5000 results I sent to this server. But indeed, 34 and 36 should be accepted too in my opinion. I think that battles against rambots (used to) have the most chance on getting these non-35 results. --[[User:GrubbmGait|GrubbmGait]] 23:16, 27 September 2008 (UTC) | *There was only one unmatching battle (17+14) in the over 5000 results I sent to this server. But indeed, 34 and 36 should be accepted too in my opinion. I think that battles against rambots (used to) have the most chance on getting these non-35 results. --[[User:GrubbmGait|GrubbmGait]] 23:16, 27 September 2008 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | The current check is that the survival totals ''at least'' 35 should that should take into account ties. But the results that are getting stuck on my clients are for <35 1st place survivals. One client has 24-8 (32 total) for Cephalosporin vs UrChicken2. Two of my clients (not physically here, checked on them yesterday) had about a dozen battles involving RougeDC Classic, also with less than 34. What to do? --[[User:Darkcanuck|Darkcanuck]] 23:55, 27 September 2008 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 00:55, 28 September 2008
Survival count should total 35
I want to confirm what has already been mentioned: survival count should not necessarily total 35. It appears that when bots die on the same tick, they both get credited with a first place finish. --Simonton 22:49, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
- There was only one unmatching battle (17+14) in the over 5000 results I sent to this server. But indeed, 34 and 36 should be accepted too in my opinion. I think that battles against rambots (used to) have the most chance on getting these non-35 results. --GrubbmGait 23:16, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
The current check is that the survival totals at least 35 should that should take into account ties. But the results that are getting stuck on my clients are for <35 1st place survivals. One client has 24-8 (32 total) for Cephalosporin vs UrChicken2. Two of my clients (not physically here, checked on them yesterday) had about a dozen battles involving RougeDC Classic, also with less than 34. What to do? --Darkcanuck 23:55, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
