Difference between revisions of "Talk:Targeting Challenge (original)/Results"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Trimming data: feel free) |
|||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Would anyone mind to much if I trimmed the data to at most 2 decimal places, and the few 100 scores to 100.0? That was we can even out and neaten up the rows somewhat. --[[User:Chase-san|Chase]] 07:32, 25 March 2009 (UTC) | Would anyone mind to much if I trimmed the data to at most 2 decimal places, and the few 100 scores to 100.0? That was we can even out and neaten up the rows somewhat. --[[User:Chase-san|Chase]] 07:32, 25 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | : A bit late to respond here, but of course not, go right ahead. I doubt any of these results are accurate to 3 decimal places, anyway. =) --[[User:Voidious|Voidious]] 14:14, 28 April 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:14, 28 April 2009
This page needs the targeting type abbreviations list from below the results table. Regarding the topic "wowie" on the initial post - I hope you used the table converter for this? I like the border style here, I might update the table convert to use that. --Voidious 20:00, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
- I did, but it was still large. The table has collapsed borders, and a 85% font size. I forgot about the abbv list. --Chase 21:58, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
Trimming data
Would anyone mind to much if I trimmed the data to at most 2 decimal places, and the few 100 scores to 100.0? That was we can even out and neaten up the rows somewhat. --Chase 07:32, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
- A bit late to respond here, but of course not, go right ahead. I doubt any of these results are accurate to 3 decimal places, anyway. =) --Voidious 14:14, 28 April 2009 (UTC)