Difference between revisions of "Talk:BlitzBat"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
GrubbmGait (talk | contribs) (Nice strong meleemicro!) |
(megabot style code) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
: Shrinking without losing any functionality is hard, the difference between place 5 and 17 is quite large. --[[User:GrubbmGait|GrubbmGait]] 19:45, 31 May 2009 (UTC) | : Shrinking without losing any functionality is hard, the difference between place 5 and 17 is quite large. --[[User:GrubbmGait|GrubbmGait]] 19:45, 31 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | : Well... lots in MiniSurreptitious in megabot style (using StatusEvent, storing Point2D objects, splitting into lots of little functions, a class to represent enemies), and it's not hitting the upper limit of a mini either... so I'm pretty sure I could shrink to micro without losing functionality really --[[User:Rednaxela|Rednaxela]] 19:53, 31 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 20:53, 31 May 2009
Strong Melee Micro
Care to tell us about it Voidious? :) --Rednaxela 15:17, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
- And this reminds me... I really should try shrinking MiniSurreptitious to a Micro... there's plenty of room to I bet, an it ranks just behind BlitzBat in the Mini rankings... --Rednaxela 15:22, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
- Shrinking without losing any functionality is hard, the difference between place 5 and 17 is quite large. --GrubbmGait 19:45, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
- Well... lots in MiniSurreptitious in megabot style (using StatusEvent, storing Point2D objects, splitting into lots of little functions, a class to represent enemies), and it's not hitting the upper limit of a mini either... so I'm pretty sure I could shrink to micro without losing functionality really --Rednaxela 19:53, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
