User talk:Nat
- Archived Talk:
- 2009/04/06 - 2009/06/20
Let see if I get confirmation email. » Nat | Talk » 14:34, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
- I think it ignores your own edits. So here you go. =) --Voidious 14:37, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
Contents
Birthday 2009
Attention guys, today is a very special day! At least to me, because today (July 3) is my birthday! Mind giving me a little "Happy Birthday"? LOL » Nat | Talk » 11:15, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
Happy Birthday!--CrazyBassoonist 12:44, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
Lol, happy birthday man! Hope it's a good one ;) --Spinnercat 15:28, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
Happy birthday =) --Skilgannon 15:40, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
Happy Birthday, Nat. Don't party too hard. =) --Voidious 17:26, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
Happy Birthday Nat, hope you have fun ;-) --zyx 18:25, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
{}
||
____||_____
{} {~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~} {}
|| { ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ } ||
__||__{___________}__||__
{\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\}
{} { H a p p y \} {}
|| {\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\} ||
__||_{_________________________}_||__
{\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\}
{ }
{ B i r t h d a y ! ! ! }
{ }
{/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/}
{_____________________________________}
-- Synapse 21:17, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
Haha, happy birthday Nat. Hope it's a good one! --Rednaxela 23:50, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
Thanks guy. Actually I don't have a party, nor cake (except the one above), nor presents =) I've got my present 3 months ago (new notebook that I'm currently sitting in front of) and I hate party! It take the time that I usually sit in front of my computer away. However, this isn't a good one. I've got a cold! Or at least I hope it only cold, not swine flu ;-) » Nat | Talk » 01:38, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
MicroBot Wave Surfing
Anyone have 10TB of memory and hard disk to spare? I need that to perform my own microbot wave surfing. The large part of Wave Surfing is precise prediction, which nonetheless can't fit in micro. I wonder if I cached all the prediction and just access it at runtime. Now I roughly calculated. Let see, I restricted the location, absBearing, velocity and distance to all integer. Total possible location on the map is 764*564 = 430896 locations, multiply by 360 absBearing, ~950 distance, 17 velocity. Saves in short (2 bytes), contain x and y will result in around 764*564*360*950*17*2*2 = 10020917376000 B = 9786052125 KiB = ~9,556,692 MiB = ~9,333 GiB = ~9.114 TiB.
Anyone have ideas how can I reduced those number? If I use 80*60 possible locations, 36 possible absBearing, 17 velocity and 19 possible distance, it still cost 43MB Note that this need to be preloaded into the robot, not calculating on-the-fly. Nat | Talk » 05:17, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
I've done a fair amount of work with precalculated movement table things. I once got a precalculated movement table down to about 2MB, but that's still too big for ethical pre-loading, AND the optimizations it used took rather large codesize to turn into something usable in battle. I don't think you're going to be able make this realistically work Nat honestly. --Rednaxela 05:27, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
=( Well, thanks for the info. » Nat | Talk » 05:50, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
I'll let you borrow my tables when I get around to adding micros to my list ;) --Miked0801 09:02, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
- I'm not talking about the VCS table, I'm talking about movement table i.e. the table that allow you to know what is your position next tick if you are at (x,y) with a velocity of v and the enemy is at θ with a distance of d or something. It is the replacement of Precise Prediction used in minibot and megabot. » Nat | Talk » 09:25, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
I haven't dealed with wavesurfing yet, but do you need precise prediction? Is there anything less complex that could replace it? Anyway, take a look at kb.WaveShark, it's supposed to be a wavesurfer. --HUNRobar 14:38, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
LOL, it is kc.WaveShark. Actually it is that robot which inspire me about this. » Nat | Talk » 14:40, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
Pugilist is an example of a wave surfing without precise prediction I think, that might be able to give some inspiration --Rednaxela 15:53, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks. I have looked at it now, the prediction thing is still too large I think. But I'll give it a try... » Nat | Talk » 16:09, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
Bi-hourly release
Wonder is this is right thing to do or not. Because the number of clients running among this day, I can release my robot bi-hourly. But since I'm not running those clients, I not sure if this is right thing to do or not. » Nat | Talk » 11:42, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
- if there are no other bots waiting, not a problem. But, my bot has been waiting for a bit to get to 2k battles in nanos. If you need this much info and are feeling guilty, use roboresearch for your tests. You'll get your answers just as quick without the guilt. --Miked0801 15:26, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
- Sorry. When I checked and see the "PAIRINGS COMPLETE" text, I decided that the ranking is completed. Actually I'm not needing it fast, just roughly seen where it place is enough for me to decided what to do with next version, and I usually take only 10 minutes to do it. I'll try to run it on RoboResarch next time. Thanks. » Nat | Talk » 15:39, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
- I think the rule of thumb used to be maximum one release per day? There are quite a few bots in the nano & micro categories still below 2000 battles. If you're feeling guilty, run a client and help out... --Darkcanuck 17:28, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
Number of Edits
Hmm... I wonder if the number of edits at Special:Preferences correct? Mine is currently 1,653 (at the time of writing, so perhaps this shall count as another one), but the Special:Statistics said that total edits is currently 9,954. I don't think I make an edit that much. » Nat | Talk » 13:36, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
{{Wikipedia}} template use
Hey Nat, I really recommend you don't use the {{Wikipedia}} template on the Twin Duel and RoboRumble pages like that. The reason being, the text "Wikipedia has an article about: Twin Duel" is very much NOT true, as it's only a minor section. I don't think it's sensible to use this template for one-section-only links. See Talk:Anti-Gravity_Movement#Wikipedia_link --Rednaxela 15:24, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
I see. Thanks, perhaps new template with "Wikipedia has a section about: Twin Duel ... in page Robocode" is better =) I'll remove them. Thanks again. » Nat | Talk » 15:31, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
SDS + Zoom = ?
For any who doesn't know what is SDS and Zoom Targeting, I'll explain briefly. SDS (Symbolic Dynamic Segmentation) is a data management system that you will map the data to a string that represent a state of the data. When you need data, just match the current state with the state of each data. If they are no match or too few matches, just strip last character out and do the match again. Do this until you have enough matches you want.
Zoom Targeting looks similar but indeed it isn't. It have fixed number of 'zoom' level, each level with different preciseness of the states. The deeper the zoom level, the more precise the state is. When you zoom in, it will act more like wave-based pattern matching. When you zoom out it will act more like statistical gun.
Now I'm thinking of combine them together. Like SDS-based data storing and using Zoom Targeting algorithm to choose number of segmentation to use? Any ideas?
Also, please help me think of a name. I'm considering of 'Statistical Zoom Data Management Algorithm' but it won't fit at all. » Nat | Talk » 07:32, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
OOP vs. Pluggable?
Hmm... I want to know, do you guys prefer more OOP or more Pluggable? I mean, I'm development a very pluggable robot (I mean, they have very little shared class) and still OOP-ed (mean that it have clean structure). (While I must accept that current top robot, DrussGT is the most pluggable =)) I realised that my repeat my code a lot. Currently the core of my GF gun contains 6 files: EnemyMovementProfile (interface), GuessFactorGun, GunScanLog, GunScan, GunWave and GunStats (interface). My movement engine has almost exact file with almost exactly the same content (EnemyMovementProfile vs SelfMovementProfile; GuessFactorGun vs WaveSurfingmovement; Gun... vs Movement...). And I can merge a lot of it into single file (or using abstract class) easily. In this case, do you guys choose to use the very pluggable structure with less OOP or more OOP with less pluggability? » Nat | Talk » 10:54, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
