Mixed Rating Systems

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Mixed Rating Systems

You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reasons:

  • The action you have requested is limited to users in the group: Users.
  • You must confirm your email address before editing pages. Please set and validate your email address through your user preferences.

You can view and copy the source of this page.

 

Return to Thread:Talk:Darkcanuck/RRServer/Ratings/Mixed Rating Systems.

I like that approach myself. Though I think I would limit it to APS and W%.

Skotty16:30, 21 September 2011
 

Nevermind, forget what I said. I didn't read it close enough. I was thinking that I would like something that averages APS and W%, with the weight of each not necessarily being equal.

Skotty16:54, 21 September 2011
 

Averaged would be nice in that it would allow easier differentiation between small changes, but on the other hand, condorcet ranking has the property of not allowing one metric to dominate. I think there are advantages to each way of mixing.

Rednaxela17:56, 21 September 2011
 

Both condorcet and averaging can allow one kind of metric to dominate through clones. Similar methods together will overweight other unique methods. Ballots need to be independent from the candidates (methods) to avoid the clone problem.

MN05:53, 7 October 2011