Performance Enhancing Bug

Fragment of a discussion from Talk:Anti-Surfer Targeting
← Thread:Talk:Anti-Surfer Targeting/Performance Enhancing Bug/reply (14)

Jump to navigation Jump to search

I've wondered about a random targeting scheme that only shoots within precise MEA. Have you tested that vs. your anti-surfer?

Skilgannon (talk)‎

No, but I've been curious about that too, only for one bot in particular... ;)

Voidious (talk)‎

You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reasons:

The action you have requested is limited to users in the group: Users.
You must confirm your email address before editing pages. Please set and validate your email address through your user preferences.

You can view and copy the source of this page.

I've found myself wondering about the reverse recently... if a sufficiently advanced (I have some tricks in mind...) random-movement surfer (note, not active flattener) could outperform usual methods against some of the strongest anti-surfer targeting that a few bots have...

Return to Thread:Talk:Anti-Surfer Targeting/Performance Enhancing Bug/reply (16).

This I actually have spent a substantial amount of time working on. All sorts of extra randomization of surfing stats, fully random surf stats that get completely regenerated each time you get hit, or every so often, mixes of random and normal surf stats and flatteners, and so on. I thought a totally new movement profile every time you get hit would have a lot of potential, but I just didn't get it close to outperforming my existing stuff.

Voidious (talk)‎

Retrieved from "http://robowiki.net/wiki/Thread:Talk:Anti-Surfer_Targeting/Performance_Enhancing_Bug/reply_(14)#Performance_Enhancing_Bug_3332"