Regarding PrioQueue

Jump to navigation Jump to search

So, it turns out that if I use Oracle Java in Windows instead of OpenJDK on Linux, the performance is very different: 

 - #1 Skilgannon's Cache-hit KDTree [0.0419]
 - #2 Rednaxela's kd-tree (3rd gen) [0.0451]
 - #3 Rednaxela's kd-tree (2nd gen) [0.0458]
 - #4 Voidious' Linear search [0.7056]
  1. All of them perform much worse in OracleJava/Windows than it did on OpenJDK/Linux
  2. The relative performance of things looks much more similar to what you saw, with only a small difference between my 3rd and 2nd gen tree, with your one performing better
Rednaxela (talk)‎03:43, 19 July 2013

You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reasons:

  • The action you have requested is limited to users in the group: Users.
  • You must confirm your email address before editing pages. Please set and validate your email address through your user preferences.

You can view and copy the source of this page.

Return to Thread:User talk:Skilgannon/KDTree/Regarding PrioQueue/reply (12).

 
Retrieved from "http://robowiki.net/wiki/Thread:User_talk:Skilgannon/KDTree/Regarding_PrioQueue/reply_(11)#Regarding_PrioQueue_3582"