Interval Heap vs MinHeap

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Just tried that. The pruning is still not paying off compared to the extra overhead of the IntervalHeap.

Rednaxela (talk)‎15:05, 20 July 2013

You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reasons:

  • The action you have requested is limited to users in the group: Users.
  • You must confirm your email address before editing pages. Please set and validate your email address through your user preferences.

You can view and copy the source of this page.

Return to Thread:User talk:Rednaxela/kD-Tree/Interval Heap vs MinHeap/reply (4).

I was thinking it was the different heap... but actually turns out the heaps are approximately the same performance, with the difference being the pruning: 

 - #1 Rednaxela's kd-tree (3rd gen, Interval Heap) [0.0290]
 - #2 Rednaxela's kd-tree (3rd gen) [0.0290]
 - #3 Rednaxela's kd-tree (3rd gen, Interval Heap, Prune When Points Added) [0.0293]
 - #4 Rednaxela's kd-tree (3rd gen, Interval Heap, Avoid Growing Heap When Possible) [0.0294]
 - #5 Skilgannon's Cache-hit KDTree [0.0296]
Rednaxela (talk)‎16:26, 20 July 2013

So the incremental difference from a larger heap is less than the cost of removing the points.

Skilgannon (talk)‎19:54, 20 July 2013
 
 
 
Retrieved from "http://robowiki.net/wiki/Thread:User_talk:Rednaxela/kD-Tree/Interval_Heap_vs_MinHeap/reply_(3)#Interval_Heap_vs_MinHeap_3590"