Dodging Performance Anomaly?

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Running 50+ random forests with 50 trees each would be a lot of computation. I am first going to try seeing how well one RF predicts a GF or bearing offset.

Straw (talk)‎23:22, 16 November 2013

You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reasons:

  • The action you have requested is limited to users in the group: Users.
  • You must confirm your email address before editing pages. Please set and validate your email address through your user preferences.

You can view and copy the source of this page.

Return to Thread:Talk:Pris/Dodging Performance Anomaly?/reply (9).

The problem would be training the forests, which is much slower. Training one forest would be much easier, allowing you to do more training and perhaps have a higher tree count. I plan to eventually try both anyway, but I am doing the easier approach first.

Straw (talk)‎03:24, 17 November 2013
 
 
Retrieved from "http://robowiki.net/wiki/Thread:Talk:Pris/Dodging_Performance_Anomaly%3F/reply_(8)#Dodging_Performance_Anomaly.3F_3836"