Hitting Pure Flattened Movement?

Fragment of a discussion from Talk:Flattener
← Thread:Talk:Flattener/Hitting Pure Flattened Movement?/reply (6)

Jump to navigation Jump to search

You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reasons:

The action you have requested is limited to users in the group: Users.
You must confirm your email address before editing pages. Please set and validate your email address through your user preferences.

You can view and copy the source of this page.

Knowing where they won't be increases your average hitrate over time, by limiting the places they could be. Imagine a targeting system which fires outside of their MEA vs one that always fires in the MEA.

Return to Thread:Talk:Flattener/Hitting Pure Flattened Movement?/reply (6).

Oh for sure. My most sophisticated attempts at fancy Anti-Surfer guns were along these lines - assume they will go to the safest reachable point on all of the waves in the air at fire time, using precise prediction to figure out reachable points, then restrict my choice of firing angles to the range of remaining reachable points.

What I really want is a mask to apply to the whole range of firing angles, deduced from the probability of all possible enemy movements as they surf the waves in the air. I tried a very (very!) crude version of this once in Dookious.

Voidious (talk)‎

Retrieved from "http://robowiki.net/wiki/Thread:Talk:Flattener/Hitting_Pure_Flattened_Movement%3F/reply_(6)#Hitting_Pure_Flattened_Movement.3F_4126"