Using previous GFs as dimensions

Fragment of a discussion from Talk:Dynamic Clustering
← Thread:Talk:Dynamic Clustering/Using previous GFs as dimensions/reply (3)

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Don't worry! I am actively optimizing my more "normal" gun using standard predictors. What bots would you recommend as good test bots with strong RM? Tmservo its just a 6 dimensional KNN, 5 are lastGFs normalized to 0-1, last one is sqrt(shots)* .5. I haven't added any kernel density stuff to this tree, I plan to try that.

Straw (talk)‎

just drussgt, diamond, gilgalad, tomcat, xandercat, waveserpent, nene, gressuffurd,

Tmservo (talk)‎

Those are not bots with Random Movement as Straw asked for.

Rednaxela (talk)‎

You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reasons:

The action you have requested is limited to users in the group: Users.
You must confirm your email address before editing pages. Please set and validate your email address through your user preferences.

You can view and copy the source of this page.

I'd suggest you use the reference bots from the [[Targeting Challenge RM]], because they give you a good variety of random movements, and have been thoroughly tested against before, so the 'expected' result is fairly accurately known. You may wish to use [[RoboRunner]] to automate testing against that set as well.

Return to Thread:Talk:Dynamic Clustering/Using previous GFs as dimensions/reply (6).

Yeah, like Rednaxela said, the reference bots would work well. I'm curious, are you planning to have these two guns in a VG array, or are you just experimenting in parallel?

Sheldor (talk)‎

Not sure yet, could use a VG array, or might get results from two trees and do density calculations on the results from both.

Straw (talk)‎

Retrieved from "http://robowiki.net/wiki/Thread:Talk:Dynamic_Clustering/Using_previous_GFs_as_dimensions/reply_(3)#Using_previous_GFs_as_dimensions_4228"