Using previous GFs as dimensions

Fragment of a discussion from Talk:Dynamic Clustering
← Thread:Talk:Dynamic Clustering/Using previous GFs as dimensions/reply (12)

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Straw already said that there are six dimensions in his(?) gun, one for decay, and one for each of the enemy's last five visited GFs.

Sheldor (talk)‎

You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reasons:

The action you have requested is limited to users in the group: Users.
You must confirm your email address before editing pages. Please set and validate your email address through your user preferences.

You can view and copy the source of this page.

I'm just curious if they're being treated independently. A sequence like 0, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8 actually might be quite close to 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1.0, but if they're all treated independently, your classification won't see it that way.

Return to Thread:Talk:Dynamic Clustering/Using previous GFs as dimensions/reply (13).

If one wanted to make the ones you mention be treated similar, the way to do it would be to make the dimensions either:

GF[i], (GF[i] - GF[i-1]), (GF[i-1] - GF[i-2]), (GF[i-2] - GF[i-3]), (GF[i-3] - GF[i-4])

or perhaps:

GF[i], (GF[i] - GF[i-1]), (GF[i] - GF[i-2]), (GF[i] - GF[i-3]), (GF[i] - GF[i-4])

(where index 'i' is the most recent wave, 'i-1' is the second most recent wave, etc)

Of course, whether that would give better results than all independantly I have no idea about... and which of those ways of making it relative would be better I'm not sure about either.

Rednaxela (talk)‎

I appreciate the concerned ? with his. I am male though.

Straw (talk)‎

Retrieved from "http://robowiki.net/wiki/Thread:Talk:Dynamic_Clustering/Using_previous_GFs_as_dimensions/reply_(12)#Using_previous_GFs_as_dimensions_4223"