Fire power 2.95 bug

Fragment of a discussion from User talk:Beaming
← Thread:User talk:Beaming/Fire power 2.95 bug/reply (2)

Jump to navigation Jump to search

You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reasons:

The action you have requested is limited to users in the group: Users.
You must confirm your email address before editing pages. Please set and validate your email address through your user preferences.

You can view and copy the source of this page.

Yeah... IIRC I was doing some extensive default bullet power testing and found that 1.95 drastically outperformed both 1.94 and 1.96 in a large test bed and this turned out to be why. I felt kind of dirty since I was both the person that introduced the bug and the one who figured out how to exploit it. :-/

Return to Thread:User talk:Beaming/Fire power 2.95 bug/reply (2).

Thanks guys. This clears it.

In retrospect, it is even strange to see the old based on rounding code. Is it a remainder of some attempts of code shrinking?

Looks like nobody wants to use buil-in robocode.util.utils.isNear :)

Beaming (talk)‎

Retrieved from "http://robowiki.net/wiki/Thread:User_talk:Beaming/Fire_power_2.95_bug/reply_(2)#Fire_power_2.95_bug_4830"