Good Jump

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Yes it makes sense. I once got +%5.2 APS by getting the sum of Anti-Surfer and Anti-Random weighted by their hit rates. (The old gun was just AS).
Do you use pre-processing in your NN? It can be really helpful.
Dsekercioglu (talk)19:30, 25 August 2017

I'm not sure what you mean by pre-processing. Can you clarify that?

Rsalesc (talk)20:10, 25 August 2017
    • For example you have two attributes x, y
    • Use some formula on it.
    • For example input = {|x|, |0.5 - x|, |1 - x|, |y|, |0.5 - y|, |1 - y|}
    • Give it to the Neural Network
Dsekercioglu (talk)21:46, 25 August 2017

You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reasons:

  • The action you have requested is limited to users in the group: Users.
  • You must confirm your email address before editing pages. Please set and validate your email address through your user preferences.

You can view and copy the source of this page.

Return to Thread:Talk:SimpleBot/Good Jump/reply (10).

Yes of course you can get a good score against surfers with an only NN. After only tuning against Shadow I got a %74.2 score against him.

I don't know what type of pre-processing you use but mine uses gaussian function instead of abs as above. Maybe you should try it.
Remove some data and try it again. Some data slows down NN learning.
Change your training process. For example don't train your NN when enemy doesn't have any waves to surf.
Try to find an error in your NN. ColdBreath is the fixed version of Havoc(116th) whose backpropogation was wrong.
By the way congrats with Roborio. Really High PWIN.
Dsekercioglu (talk)10:46, 26 August 2017