Stop and Go

Fragment of a discussion from Talk:Basilisk
← Thread:Talk:Basilisk/Stop and Go/reply (8)

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Maybe I should move the stop and go into the onScannedRobot event instead of its current goTo void. Currently I am using prevEnergy > enemyEnergy, with enemyEnergy being called every tick and prevEnergy being called right after moving. If I move it into the onScannedRobot event, and use prevEnergy > e.getEnergy(), do you think that would fix some of its problems? Thanks!

Slugzilla (talk)‎

As long as you are checking if delta energy is between 0.1 and 3.0 there shouldn’t be any problems. I think that your current system of upgrading enemy energy is working but I’m not sure.

Dsekercioglu (talk)‎

Currently I am just checking if the energy drop is greater than 0.1. I'll add a 3.0 segment later to fix that up. By the way, congratulations on Partial getting #23! The race is neck to neck =)

Slugzilla (talk)‎

You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reasons:

The action you have requested is limited to users in the group: Users.
You must confirm your email address before editing pages. Please set and validate your email address through your user preferences.

You can view and copy the source of this page.

:Oops, you might want to use 0.099 < e < 3.01. Sometimes energy 3.0 and 0.1 won’t be detected.
:Partial is using Simonton’s PM Gun so there is a lot to improve. You might have noticed its low Pwin. I am prettt sure Basilisk will enter top 20 when the bug is fixed though.

Return to Thread:Talk:Basilisk/Stop and Go/reply (11).

Oh sorry, i misspoke. I check if the energy drop is greater than the previous energy, so 0.1 should register. Are you going to add on to the PM gun or maybe try out a guessfactor gun?

Slugzilla (talk)‎

Retrieved from "http://robowiki.net/wiki/Thread:Talk:Basilisk/Stop_and_Go/reply_(8)#Stop_and_Go_6553"