Flattener vs. Random

Fragment of a discussion from Talk:Flattener
← Thread:Talk:Flattener/Flattener vs. Random/reply (2)

Jump to navigation Jump to search

I don't understand, what's unethical about it?

Slugzilla (talk)‎

Sorry, my wording wasn't clear: in order to have a better score against all flatteners, you have to exploit it like [LittleBlackBook] does(which I don't really approve btw) because otherwise your targeting will most likely be average against flatteners.

Dsekercioglu (talk)‎

You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reasons:

The action you have requested is limited to users in the group: Users.
You must confirm your email address before editing pages. Please set and validate your email address through your user preferences.

You can view and copy the source of this page.

Ah, that makes sense.  But against the guns in [[ScalarN]] or [[DrussGT]], would a standard flattener or random movement work better?

Return to Thread:Talk:Flattener/Flattener vs. Random/reply (4).

I'm pretty sure a good flattener would outperform random movement after seeing ScalarBot with a PWIN of %100 percent only with a tick flattener but WhiteFang's flattener would most definitely do worse than standard random movement =)

Dsekercioglu (talk)‎

Retrieved from "http://robowiki.net/wiki/Thread:Talk:Flattener/Flattener_vs._Random/reply_(2)#Flattener_vs._Random_6643"