Weird rumble scores

Fragment of a discussion from Talk:BeepBoop
← Thread:Talk:BeepBoop/Weird rumble scores/reply (10)

Jump to navigation Jump to search

For the specific case I mentioned of ags.Glacier 0.3.0 versus lxx.Emerald 0.6.5, when it was at 1 battle, I thought it was likely some rare exception as you say, but then a 2nd battle came in with about the same low score as the 1st battle, and yet I'm not able to reproduce a result anything like that in many many tests. This leads me to believe that there is most likely something significantly different about the environment those two battles were run in, as compared to my own environment.

Rednaxela (talk)‎

You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reasons:

The action you have requested is limited to users in the group: Users.
You must confirm your email address before editing pages. Please set and validate your email address through your user preferences.

You can view and copy the source of this page.

I think there must have been a bad client running at some point. BeepBoop 0.14a is identical to 0.14, but is getting 0.3 points better in the rumble now. Even weirder, I just noticed that BeepBoop 0.13 has 85% against eem.awful, which disables itself at the beginning of each battle!

Return to Thread:Talk:BeepBoop/Weird rumble scores/reply (12).

Let’s wait more battles, if the score goes down to some similar APS after ~30000 battles, then every body’s client is fine.

Retrieved from "http://robowiki.net/wiki/Thread:Talk:BeepBoop/Weird_rumble_scores/reply_(10)#Weird_rumble_scores_6792"