Weird rumble scores

Fragment of a discussion from Talk:BeepBoop
← Thread:Talk:BeepBoop/Weird rumble scores/reply (34)

Jump to navigation Jump to search

I stopped Xor_Sily. It's some high performance server that costs $40 a week. Maybe we need some test set to verify rumble clients before entry, making it easier to serve a client.

Btw, could you re-submit a version and run rumbles on your machine, and see if we can get the correct result now?

You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reasons:

The action you have requested is limited to users in the group: Users.
You must confirm your email address before editing pages. Please set and validate your email address through your user preferences.

You can view and copy the source of this page.

I think the problem is that Xor_Sily is running 7/24, for months. If memory leak happens, GC will get worse and worse. Maybe I should add some auto restart script later and try again.

Return to Thread:Talk:BeepBoop/Weird rumble scores/reply (35).

You can set the max iterations in the client and run it in a bash loop.

Skilgannon (talk)‎

Great suggestion. I will try after BeepBoop get some stable result.

What sort of high performance server is this? If it's virtualized rather than true dedicated, it wouldn't surprise me if the exact amount of available CPU varies dramatically from moment-to-moment even if the provider is guaranteeing some number of cores worth of overall performance.

Could be interesting to some time make a tool for measuring the stability of available CPU, based on running rapidly running a series of identical micro-benchmarks and looking at the variations in how long it takes.

Rednaxela (talk)‎

Retrieved from "http://robowiki.net/wiki/Thread:Talk:BeepBoop/Weird_rumble_scores/reply_(34)#Weird_rumble_scores_6835"