View source for User talk:CrazyBassoonist

From Robowiki
Revision as of 16:52, 18 August 2009 by CrazyBassoonist (talk | contribs) (moved User talk:CrazyBassoonist to User talk:CrazyBassoonist/Archived Talk 2009/08/18: Archive talk)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Redirect page
User talk:CrazyBassoonist
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Contents

Thread titleRepliesLast modified
Welcome back :)222:47, 5 May 2012
micro/nano melee rumble104:58, 28 April 2012
supersample bots302:50, 6 September 2011

Welcome back :)

Man, this is great to see that you have changed Capulet. Hopefully this means you got a little interest in robocode again. Sorry my whole system crashed today but i will bring my contribution server asap back online and so we can see how it works :).

take care

Wompi14:33, 4 May 2012

Thanks! It was only a minor change(I switched one variable from .72 to .5), but I do plan to keep trying to make improvements as you've been hard at work beating me; congratulations by the way! It takes most people much longer to take one of the thrones. I'm downloading the roborumble pack right now (I had an older version) and once that's finished I'll run some battles to try to relieve some of the strain.

CrazyBassoonist00:25, 5 May 2012
 

Yes it was indeed a lot of work to make wallaby running and i hope you enjoy the challenge. Thanks for appreciate my work. I'm well excited to see a new version of capulet and i'm sure you will come with something that blow my mind :). I have some idears how to improve wallaby, and there are some things i don't like. Mostly the engagement of stronger (more energy left) robots and wall hitting. Right now i have hugh problems with my computer so it will take a while to fix this. But after this i'm back at the game. Till then take care.

Wompi22:47, 5 May 2012
 

micro/nano melee rumble

You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reasons:

  • The action you have requested is limited to users in the group: Users.
  • You must confirm your email address before editing pages. Please set and validate your email address through your user preferences.

You can view and copy the source of this page.

 

Return to Thread:User talk:CrazyBassoonist/micro/nano melee rumble.

I've never found a sure-fire way to know how a melee bot will do before it is released; I think there's a certain degree of randomness to melee scores as each individual battle has its own unique combination of bots that affects score outcome differently. That said, in order to determine if my robots are fit for the rumble I usually do basically what you do(long battles against 9 other bots that have been randomly selected from the different melee fields) except that instead of worrying about percentages I just check and see how it does in comparison to the bots I want it to beat. For example, I released Capulet when I noticed it was consistently beating other good micro's such as HawkOnFire and Shiz when they were paired together. I think being able to consistently bots that are good is an indicator that a bot will be good, as PL score almost always tends to exactly follow APS scores in melee fields.--CrazyBassoonist 02:58, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

CrazyBassoonist04:58, 28 April 2012
 

supersample bots

I added the supersample bots in the rumble. Feel free to move the packages to somewhere else. I couldn't upload them to the Robocode Repository.

MN04:24, 5 September 2011

I am not able to run battles with SuperCrazy, keeps telling me it can't find that bot. It is present however, but with capitals in the packagename.

GrubbmGait12:30, 5 September 2011
 

Delete the jar you have of it. In all his wisdom MN added a new version with exactly the same version string, and the RR is not case sensitive but the files are. So meaning you need to either lowercase the jar name or delete it.

Chase-san16:38, 5 September 2011
 

Removed the new version...

MN02:50, 6 September 2011