APS 95.43 is crazy

Fragment of a discussion from Talk:BeepBoop/Version History
← Thread:Talk:BeepBoop/Version History/APS 95.43 is crazy/reply (3)

Jump to navigation Jump to search

That is very solid. Btw how can you sure that each changes grant you positive APS since it’s very small, being hard to evaluate.

I do test changes against a big subset of the roborumble bots (with many seasons to make sure results are significant)

--Kev (talk)‎

Thanks, that sounds practical. I’m always doing a few seasons on the full population to test out small changes, which takes a few hours on newest hardware. However, it is still hard to make 0.1 APS changes significant.

You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reasons:

The action you have requested is limited to users in the group: Users.
You must confirm your email address before editing pages. Please set and validate your email address through your user preferences.

You can view and copy the source of this page.

Yeah, you need to run a lot of seasons, but of course that's slow. I think the right way to develop a strong bot would be to operate like the stockfish chess engine where every change is evaluated for improving performance, but I mostly just develop on my laptop so I don't have enough compute to do that.

Return to Thread:Talk:BeepBoop/Version History/APS 95.43 is crazy/reply (6).

Retrieved from "http://robowiki.net/wiki/Thread:Talk:BeepBoop/Version_History/APS_95.43_is_crazy/reply_(3)#APS_95.43_is_crazy_6965"