?????

Fragment of a discussion from Talk:DeBroglie
← Thread:Talk:DeBroglie/?????/reply (28)

Jump to navigation Jump to search

I´m using normalized Euclidean distance (weight = 1/stddev) with fast sampled deviation, which do change over time (k-NN for lazy people who don´t fine tune their bots).

I had the impression the changing weights were not being accounted for. My bot´s scoring dramatically decreased with the kd-tree. I suspect it is the cached coordinate limits inside each node. Or maybe I screwed up something while trying to use the library.

MN‎

You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reasons:

The action you have requested is limited to users in the group: Users.
You must confirm your email address before editing pages. Please set and validate your email address through your user preferences.

You can view and copy the source of this page.

Changing weights is certainly intended to be accounted for, though I hadn't tested it as much as other features. I know it couldn't be the coordinate limits inside each node, because they are copying the min/max values from the points which don't change with weighting. Do you remember which version of the tree were you trying this with?

Return to Thread:Talk:DeBroglie/?????/reply (29).

Don´t remember exactly, it was months ago, but it is either the one published here in the wiki, or the other being used in DrussGT.

MN‎

DrussGT uses an old version.

Retrieved from "http://robowiki.net/wiki/Thread:Talk:DeBroglie/%3F%3F%3F%3F%3F/reply_(28)#x.3F.3F.3F.3F.3F_790"