License
Anyone have a favorite license they'd like this work to be under? Nat's original is Public Domain.
You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reasons:
You can view and copy the source of this page.
Return to Thread:User talk:Tkiesel/MovementPredictor/License/reply.
zlib, MIT and Creative Commons Attribution all look nice to me as "credit where credit is due" permissive licenses.
The smoother method I'm hoping to use is from a talk page here on RoboWiki. RoboWiki:Copyrights is blank, so I'm not sure how to proceed with that code.
Should have this code in a testable state, hopefully with a test painter bot to squash bugs this weekend or on Monday, depending on how life goes.
Anything without a license listed is probably free to use as if it's public domain. I think we stumbled on deciding on a license for wiki content because so much of it was added before any license was specified, so it seems wrong to try and retroactively add a license. Very good point that we should update RoboWiki:Copyrights, though, given how prominently it's displayed.
I've just capped off all of deBroglie's files, including the MovementPredictor with a zlib notice.
I added a clause to two files regarding not using the code in programming competitions without my consent. Those two files are a bit more uniquely "me" (or at least represent a lot more of me bashing my head against the wall) than the rest.
As of the next release, deBroglie will be a majority zlib bot. :)
Thanks for the food for thought!
