Talk:Offline batch ELO rating system
Quite interesting. I fail to see how this makes "less assumptions on results than APS" however, since I don't believe APS makes any assumptions whatsoever, being a simple averaging of all pairings a robot is involved in. I don't see this as being less biased. Similarly valid certainly, but not less biased.
One thing I think is important to note is, I'm pretty sure the fact that you're rounding the result to a win/loss/draw probably explains the *vast* majority of the difference between this and the APS/ELO/Glicko-2 on the rumble server. I suspect that the iterative roborumble ELO result wouldn't be that different if it performed the same rounding.
--Rednaxela 13:12, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
- [View source↑]
- [History↑]
You cannot post new threads to this discussion page because it has been protected from new threads, or you do not currently have permission to edit.
Contents
| Thread title | Replies | Last modified |
|---|---|---|
| new league every year | 0 | 02:54, 5 September 2011 |
| Seperate leagues for advancedbots/robots/junior robots | 0 | 02:44, 5 September 2011 |
Peltco, this rating system purpose was to take away the interference intermediate old bots have on the top bots, so there is no need anymore to shrink the participants list. See king maker page.
There is another discussion here.
There was an "extends Robot" league discussion a long time ago. But it never made its way into RoboRumble.
Wow, LiquidThreads rocks!
