Talk:DustBunny

From Robowiki
Revision as of 15:52, 1 June 2009 by Nat (talk | contribs) (one-on-one?)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

If you manage to fit that Random/Linear gun into it, will you entered it to NanoRumble (not melee)? This bot may kill the DoctorBob records!! » Nat | Talk » 14:52, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

You cannot post new threads to this discussion page because it has been protected from new threads, or you do not currently have permission to edit.

Contents

Thread titleRepliesLast modified
dustbunny undefeated901:56, 4 December 2013

dustbunny undefeated

when will somebody make a robot that will defeat in nanomeleerumble dustbunny protip look at dustbunny's sourcecode

Tmservo (talk)20:56, 30 November 2013

why won't anybody reply to this thread

Tmservo (talk)16:06, 1 December 2013

Because you're becoming a pochemuchka.

Chase18:58, 1 December 2013

Pochemuchka is quite mildly stated for this series of questions :)

Beaming (talk)21:11, 1 December 2013
 
 

Skilgannon probably could, even though DustBunny is very advanced being an anti gravity linear targeter nano.

But I don't know if anyone can beat Wallaby with another micro.

BeastBots101 (talk)20:12, 1 December 2013

when i think about sheldor's code talent he probably could too

Tmservo (talk)00:32, 2 December 2013

Probably DustBunny but maybe not Wallaby. From what I observed, He's good with small code size bots.

By the way, am I the only one legitimately answering Tmservo's question? Also, I have no idea what pochemuchka means.

BeastBots101 (talk)01:44, 3 December 2013

Nevermind.

Just googled it.

BeastBots101 (talk)01:44, 3 December 2013
 

Most of us did at first. But he seemed to `ignore` many of our responses.

Chase05:42, 3 December 2013

Well, I guess youre right. Look at the BasicGFSurfer discussion.

BeastBots101 (talk)01:56, 4 December 2013