Talk:DustBunny

If you manage to fit that Random/Linear gun into it, will you entered it to NanoRumble (not melee)? This bot may kill the DoctorBob records!! » Nat | Talk » 14:52, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

It fits :) - I just need to find 2 more bytes to enter it into the normal rumble due to it no longer being able to call getBattleFieldWidth() and Height(). The other problem being random/linear is poor for melee - linear reduction linear is better (Infinity style.) To make it melee proof will require another 4 bytes or so. Hmmm --Miked0801 15:36, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

OMG, I found my 2 bytes. I had e.distance() cached in a register, but wasn't using it. Next release will have random linear gun with battleField sizes taken into account. Going for overall best rating next. --Miked0801 17:06, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Congrats on the Nano crowns! =) That didn't take very long. --Voidious 15:45, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Great work! Number one in both... very impressive, especially in a nano! --Skilgannon 16:10, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

when will somebody make a robot that will defeat in nanomeleerumble dustbunny protip look at dustbunny's sourcecode

why won't anybody reply to this thread

Because you're becoming a pochemuchka.

Pochemuchka is quite mildly stated for this series of questions :)

Skilgannon probably could, even though DustBunny is very advanced being an anti gravity linear targeter nano.

But I don't know if anyone can beat Wallaby with another micro.

when i think about sheldor's code talent he probably could too

Probably DustBunny but maybe not Wallaby. From what I observed, He's good with small code size bots.

By the way, am I the only one legitimately answering Tmservo's question? Also, I have no idea what pochemuchka means.

Nevermind.

Just googled it.

Most of us did at first. But he seemed to `ignore` many of our responses.

Well, I guess youre right. Look at the BasicGFSurfer discussion.